Taking the “Second Step” Toward Existential Transformation Upon Confirming My Retirement Date: A Philosophical Perspective from a Mid-Life Severe Disability

Spread the love

[Meta Description]

Facing the reality of a confirmed retirement date as a mid-life severely disabled person, this article offers a philosophical exploration of the “second step” toward major life changes, deeply reflecting on the essence of existence, transformation, and moving toward the future.

[Main Target Keywords]

Confirmed retirement date, change, philosophical reflection Mid-life severe disability, meaning of change Self-transformation, second step, ontology

[Table of Contents]

  • Introduction | The Meaning of “Confirmation” in the Decision to Retire: A Path Chosen by Existence
  • Chapter 1 | Ontology of the “First Step” and the “Second Step”
  • Chapter 2 | Ontological Change from the Perspective of a Severely Disabled Person
  • Chapter 3 | Philosophizing the “Second Step” Toward Major Change
  • Chapter 4 | The “Second Step” as Existential Transformation
  • Conclusion | Change as the Fundamental Response of Existence

Introduction | The Meaning of “Confirmation” in the Decision to Retire: A Path Chosen by Existence

It has been officially decided that I will begin retirement procedures after the Golden Week holidays. Though it may seem like a routine administrative step, for me, it signifies a profound existential choice to step into the future. In this article, from the perspective of a mid-life severely disabled individual, I will reinterpret this “second step of major change” through a philosophical lens and deeply reflect on the essence of existence and transformation.


Chapter 1 | Ontology of the “First Step” and the “Second Step”

The first step in change is an internal decision—the moment when existence questions itself and attempts to choose its future. By contrast, the second step is the transition from potentiality to actuality, where intention begins to respond to the real world. Here, the very mode of being transforms.


Chapter 2 | Ontological Change from the Perspective of a Severely Disabled Person

Disability is not merely a limitation of the body; it is an event that demands a redefinition of existence itself. To live as a mid-life severely disabled person is to be in a constant process of questioning one’s way of being. Now, choosing change once again, I am attempting to open myself anew to the world. To live is to keep opening oneself continuously to the world.


Chapter 3 | Philosophizing the “Second Step” Toward Major Change

To take the second step, three mindsets are essential:

1. Acceptance of Impermanence

Change is the condition of existence. Accepting the impermanence that everything flows and transforms allows the future to open.

2. Affirmation of Incompleteness

Human existence is always unfinished. Embracing our contradictions and gaps fosters the flexibility necessary for transformation.

3. Openness to Relationships

The self exists only within the web of relationships with the world. Change is the act of continually renewing these relationships.


Chapter 4 | The “Second Step” as Existential Transformation

The confirmed retirement date is not just an administrative procedure; it is a sign of deep internal transformation. Even as I carry fear and anxiety, I am beginning anew to question my existence and respond to the world. This internal movement is true change and self-transformation itself.


Conclusion | Change as the Fundamental Response of Existence

Behind the external event of retirement lies a fundamental happening—the reopening of existence to the world. To live is to continually cast oneself into the unknown future. Without fearing change, I wish to continue walking this “second step” as a joy of being.


[Summary] This article started from the event of “confirmation of retirement date” and deeply explored the philosophical meaning of change from the standpoint of a mid-life severely disabled person. I wish to affirm quietly that change is not a risk but the natural movement of existence itself and a continuous dialogue with the future.

コメントを残す

2027年度の障害者雇用戦略|法定雇用率2.7%時代、経営者が見直すべき組織設計と90日改革

Spread the love

2027年度に向けた障害者雇用戦略を解説。法定雇用率2.7%時代、経営者・管理職は何を変える…

「普通に働ける人」を前提にした会社は、いつまで強いのか――障害者雇用から考えるBPRと業務設計

Spread the love

「普通に働ける人」という前提が、人材の可能性を狭めていないか。元管理職で中途重度障害当事者の…

なぜ「答え」を渡すのをやめたのか?

――重度障害者になって気づいた、問いが人を動かす理由

Spread the love

管理職として「答えを与える側」だった私が、30歳で脳出血を発症し、中途重度障害者として「配慮…

● Recent Articles
Verified by MonsterInsights